Circumstantial Evidence
It is quite common, and some may think it fashionable to cry out against circumstantial evidence; while the fact is—and a fact not to be disputed—that no evidence is more reliable.
Circumstances do not lie; they are trustworthy as far as they go, and the only thing required to render their evidence indisputable is, that no link in the chain shall be lacking.
To be sure there is a liability to error, but it is not through danger that the circumstances may prove treacherous, but that a witness may be mistaken in his direct evidence, or testimony. Absolutely and truly, direct testimony—the recounting of what a man had himself seen or heard—is always to be accepted with caution; and it not unfrequently happens that such testimony, given in the utmost good faith, proves fatal and treacherous.
Let me tell you a story to illustrate what I mean. It transpired about 20 years ago, on the shores of the Hudson.… Read More